By Harikrishnan S.
For a decade now, India has lived inside a carefully curated illusion. The Hindu-right-wing BJP government, run by the Nerendra Modi-Amit Shah duopoly, has mastered the art of perception management so thoroughly that governance itself has become secondary. Policy failures, economic shocks, communal ruptures, and flagrant institutional capture have all been airbrushed into one seamless narrative of “strong leadership” and “unprecedented growth.” And, sadly, the truly calamitous part in this drama is not merely that a ruling party built its empire on half-truths, doctored numbers, and managed outrage. The real tragedy here is that there has been no serious opposition to challenge this spectacle, no counter-vision, and certainly no counter-force capable of disrupting this machine in any way. The past ten years are a case study in what happens when a ruling party with authoritarian instincts meets an opposition that suffers from a chronic inability to read the moment. The BJP, with its bottomless resources, ruthless discipline, and single-point narrative engineering, has run circles around a Congress party still trapped in the inertia of its own past. And at the centre of this drift stands Rahul Gandhi, a political leader who has mastered the art of losing.
To call Rahul a failure is almost too kind; he has been virtually a non-factor in the very space he claims to lead. Politics, whether we like it or not, is ultimately judged by its hard outcomes – votes, seats and mandates. And, on every measurable front, he has led the Congress to humiliation after humiliation. Three consecutive general election defeats, a shrinking presence in state assemblies, and the erosion of its traditional voter base to the point where it cannot win even where it once reigned effortlessly. Any other political party in the world would have changed its leadership after such an unbroken streak of sheer disaster. Not the Congress! They continue to treat the Gandhis as irreplaceable while the country moves on without them… and move on it has.
Add to this the relentless stoking
of sectarian divisions, blatant weaponising of Hindu-Muslim
fault lines, turning religious identity into a political currency, and you get
the sharpest image of why Narendra Modi continues to command loyalty despite policy disasters that would have sunk any
other government. For a distressingly
large section of Indians, Modi’s most persuasive qualification has been that he
is perceived as the leader who has “shown Muslims their place.” No amount
of economic data or moral reasoning competes with that kind of communal
gratification.
This
political vacuum has not only enabled the BJP’s dominance; it has deepened the
vulnerabilities of those already living on the margins, from Muslims targeted
by hate campaigns to activists imprisoned under draconian laws. The absence of an effective opposition has
left millions without an institutional shield.
The Congress, as the primary opposition party, has been the weakest link in India’s democratic chain. There has been no coherent ideological alternative, no compelling leadership, no strategic vision, and indeed no message discipline. Instead of reinventing itself for a new India, the party has clung on to outdated hierarchies and ignored the lessons of its own decline. The recent Bihar elections underline this dysfunction. Even within a fragile opposition alliance, the Congress fielded candidates against INDIA bloc. partners in more than 10 constituencies, sabotaging its own coalition. This is not a party with a plan; this is a party with a death wish. And yet, because of the Congress’s legacy and reach, its failures do not remain confined to itself. Its inertia drags down the entire opposition ecosystem. It is the deadweight that prevents a credible anti-BJP front from emerging. India does not merely suffer from a strong ruling party; it suffers from the absence of a viable alternative. A democracy is only as strong as the forces that can challenge and replace its government. Today, regrettably, India has the former but lacks the latter.
Meanwhile, India’s institutional landscape, from
the Election
Commission to universities
to investigative agencies, has been quite brazenly refitted to mirror the
ruling party’s ideological
imagination. What were once neutral referees of the
republic now function like auxiliaries of the regime, their neutrality hollowed
out and their constitutional purpose reduced to a stage prop in the larger
theatre of power. India’s
democratic indices are falling year after year, placing it alongside flawed democracies and hybrid regimes. The press is intimidated, dissent is criminalised, and bureaucrats are reminded that loyalty to the
“narrative” is more important than loyalty to constitutional principles. In such an environment, the Congress’s refusal
to change its leadership is not merely political incompetence; it is apparent democratic
negligence. A 139-year-old party that
once shaped modern India has, to all intents and purposes, degenerated into a millstone around the opposition’s
neck; too weak to lead, too entitled to step aside, and too delusional to
recognise that Rahul Gandhi’s continued leadership is a liability India can no
longer afford.
If the BJP’s decade of dominance is
the story of a party that mastered perception, the Congress’s decade of decline
is the story of a party that mastered self-delusion. India is caught between a ruling party that
excels at manufacturing myths and an opposition that excels at believing its
own. And until the Congress gathers the
courage to break with its dynastic addiction and rebuild itself from the helm
downward, the BJP will continue to win, not because of its strength but because
of the opposition’s spectacular weakness!




